COVID-19 Chinese vaccine causes a domestic feud in Brazil

Author

Amidst a clash with São Paulo’s governor João Dória, President Jair Bolsonaro was also attacked by his ceremonial sash, which continually attempted to trip him up. Last week, he rejected the announced purchase of 46 million Chinese vaccine doses potentially effective against COVID-19. Although a Health Ministry document explicitly confirmed the original intent to buy the vaccine, which is developed by Sinovac in collaboration with the Brazilian Butantan Institute, Bolsonaro told the media the protocol would be canceled.

João Dória is a potential candidate for the 2022 presidential elections, and some experts affirm that the clash “had little to do with the virus and was more a way to hurt Doria.” Political analysts at XP Investimentos, a Brazilian investment firm, predict that the polarized debate will negatively affect Brazil’s economy if the matter concerning the vaccines is not addressed transparently. Instead of evaluating the potential efficacy of the vaccine, the scenario is being used to portray political views.

More Commentary

The Leftist Experiment in Bolivia Nears Its End

Despite the hurdles, the MAS crisis and Morales’s waning popularity hint at a possible political shift, one that could strengthen Bolivia’s battered democracy, pave the way for judicial reform, and address urgent environmental issues.

Read more >

The Economy Doomed Harris. Will It Doom Trump?

The paradoxical thing about Trump’s victory is that though Republicans likely won because of the importance of the economy and voters’ perception of the Democrats’ mishandling of it, Trump’s agenda based on lower taxes, higher tariffs and migrant deportations threatens to derail the recovery.

Read more >

No, Mexico Is Not Returning To Its Authoritarian Past

With the Morena party capture and dismantling of Mexico’s institutional structure, it is often declared that the country has reverted to the one-party system that dominated its politics for most of the 20th century. Yet, this interpretation is both a misreading of history and an inaccurate analogy.

Read more >
Scroll to Top