John Oliver’s take on President Fernandez’ bizarre racist tweet

Here is John Oliver's rightly surprised take not only on what President Fernandez de Kirchner tweet but also on China's lack of response, though ultimately that may have come when the Chinese Premier didn't include Argentina in his last swing through South America. He who laughs last, we guess, laughs the loudest, even in Beijing.

Author

Screen Shot 2015-05-26 at 9.38.21 PM

OK, we debated whether or not to post this. Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner’s infamous tweet while in China is so offensively racist and crude that we discussed whether it was appropriate for LatinAmericaGoesGlobal.org. And it’s a fair question. But she, oddly, seemed unperturbed by it in her follow up comments. So why should we worry?

Here is John Oliver’s rightly surprised take not only on what President Fernandez de Kirchner did but also on China’s lack of response, though ultimately that may have come when the Chinese Premier didn’t include Argentina in his last swing through South America. He who laughs last, we guess, laughs the loudest, even in Beijing.

To view it, please follow the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csYSww5yPJU

More Commentary

The Leftist Experiment in Bolivia Nears Its End

Despite the hurdles, the MAS crisis and Morales’s waning popularity hint at a possible political shift, one that could strengthen Bolivia’s battered democracy, pave the way for judicial reform, and address urgent environmental issues.

Read more >

The Economy Doomed Harris. Will It Doom Trump?

The paradoxical thing about Trump’s victory is that though Republicans likely won because of the importance of the economy and voters’ perception of the Democrats’ mishandling of it, Trump’s agenda based on lower taxes, higher tariffs and migrant deportations threatens to derail the recovery.

Read more >

No, Mexico Is Not Returning To Its Authoritarian Past

With the Morena party capture and dismantling of Mexico’s institutional structure, it is often declared that the country has reverted to the one-party system that dominated its politics for most of the 20th century. Yet, this interpretation is both a misreading of history and an inaccurate analogy.

Read more >
Scroll to Top