Webinar: AMLO’s DC Visit: Trilateral Implications

Watch our panel analyzing the implications of the first meeting between President Donald Trump and Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador.

Author

admin

View all posts

Global Americans and the Canadian Council for the Americas presents a panel analyzing the implications of the first meeting between President Donald Trump and Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador.

Speakers:

Jon Allen, Former Canadian Assistant Deputy Minister (Americas); Senior Fellow, Munk School (U of Toronto)
Dan Erikson, Former White House Special Advisor Western Hemisphere for VP Biden; Managing Director, Blue Star Strategies
Amb. Andrés Rozental, Former Mexican Deputy Foreign Minister; Founding President, Mexican Council on Foreign Relations
Ana María Salazar, Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense; Former Special Assistant to Special Envoy for the Americas (US); Security & Political Analyst
Kenneth Frankel, President, Canadian Council for the Americas (co-moderator)
Guy Mentel, Executive Director, Global Americans (co-moderator)

More Commentary

The Leftist Experiment in Bolivia Nears Its End

November 21, 2024

Despite the hurdles, the MAS crisis and Morales’s waning popularity hint at a possible political shift, one that could strengthen Bolivia’s battered democracy, pave the way for judicial reform, and address urgent environmental issues.

The Economy Doomed Harris. Will It Doom Trump?

November 20, 2024

The paradoxical thing about Trump’s victory is that though Republicans likely won because of the importance of the economy and voters’ perception of the Democrats’ mishandling of it, Trump’s agenda based on lower taxes, higher tariffs and migrant deportations threatens to derail the recovery.

No, Mexico Is Not Returning To Its Authoritarian Past

November 19, 2024

With the Morena party capture and dismantling of Mexico’s institutional structure, it is often declared that the country has reverted to the one-party system that dominated its politics for most of the 20th century. Yet, this interpretation is both a misreading of history and an inaccurate analogy.